Current repository readingScanned Jul 24, 2026, 9:58 AM UTC

lossless-claw Codebase Valuation

Lossless Claw — LCM (Lossless Context Management) plugin for OpenClaw

View Martian-Engineering/lossless-claw on GitHub
Open share card
CodeValuation.com
RepoWorth
github.com/Martian-Engineering

lossless-claw

Lossless Claw — LCM (Lossless Context Management) plugin for OpenClaw

RepoWorth$15,522Current measured development value · 9.6 active build days
Rebuild complexity80.924/100Profile: Complex
1.2M code tokens236 source filesTypeScript primary language
Scanned Jul 24, 2026Public GitHub repositorycodevaluation.com/repoworth/lossless-claw
Authored code1.2M tokens · 142,934 source lines
Complexity80.924/100 · Complex
Primary stackTypeScript
Scan coverage98.71% · Content scan
RepoWorth development valuation

One valuation, with the evidence behind it.

RepoWorth models the current development value represented by the visible repository evidence. It does not include ideation, intellectual property, business value, product discovery, or sale price.

RepoWorthCurrent measured development value
$15,522

Modeled range $12,417 to $18,626

9.6 active build days76.8 engineering hours959.9K implementation tokens
Repository evidenceMeasured at the scanned commit
1.2M tokens

142,934 source lines across 236 authored files

121 test files49 dependencies98.71% scan coverage
Measured RepoWorth history

The current RepoWorth starts the measured history.

This current scan is the first measured point. Later scans add comparable history when the repository changes. RepoWorth is not back-cast onto commits that were never scanned.

Recorded RepoWorth$15,522
Current measured reading
Measured · Jul 24, 2026Data through · Jul 24, 2026
Measurement basisCurrent readingCurrent published repository scan
Evidence coverage99%current scan
Complexity81/100Measured from code scale and structural signals
Maintainability75/100Current structure, tests, and generated-code balance

This current scan establishes the RepoWorth baseline. Comparable value changes appear only after another completed scan under the same measurement basis.

RepoWorth history compares completed repository scans only when their measurement basis is compatible. Commit activity is shown separately so delivery volume is not presented as code value.

Repository contributors

Top contributors.

Ranked from the public GitHub contributor evidence available at the latest scan. This table describes measured repository activity, not ownership or original authorship.

RankContributorContributionsShare of top groupLatest measured activity
#1Josh Lehman@jalehman55865.4%Current GitHub contributor snapshot
#2EVA@100yenadmin19122.4%Current GitHub contributor snapshot
#3Gorkem Erdogan@gorkem2020414.8%Current GitHub contributor snapshot
#4cxbAsDev@cxbAsDev151.8%Current GitHub contributor snapshot
#5mpz4life@mpz4life131.5%Current GitHub contributor snapshot
#6Dewaldt Huysamen@GodsBoy121.4%Current GitHub contributor snapshot
#7jetd1@jetd180.9%Current GitHub contributor snapshot
#8Liu Yuan@liuy50.6%Current GitHub contributor snapshot
#9liu51115@liu5111550.6%Current GitHub contributor snapshot
#10holgergruenhagen@holgergruenhagen50.6%Current GitHub contributor snapshot
About lossless-claw

What the public repository appears to contain.

Lossless Claw — LCM (Lossless Context Management) plugin for OpenClaw

License
MIT
Default branch
main
GitHub stars
4,894
Forks
433
Last public push
Jul 23, 2026
Repository state
Active public repository
Detected language profile5MB authored source
TypeScript89.33%
Go10.39%
JavaScript0.24%
MOD0.04%
Source files236
Test files121
Manifests2
Dependencies49
Measured technical evidence

A fuller view of what the scanner found.

These values come from the same immutable repository scan as the headline RepoWorth. They stay tied to the scanned commit so the reading can be inspected against one exact source state.

Maintainability signal75/100

Strong based on deterministic repository structure and complexity signals.

Production source527.9K tokens

First-party implementation tokens eligible for the modeled code-scale input.

Test evidence641K tokens

121 detected test files contribute separately from production code.

Configuration and infrastructure985 tokens

2 manifests and 0 workspace boundaries were detected.

Documentation139.3K tokens

52 documentation files remain visible as a distinct enablement signal.

Integration surface2,533 signals

49 dependency declarations and 719 public-interface signals were measured.

Repository structure3 levels deep

0 large files and 20,527 branch signals add structural context.

Excluded from authored evidence0 files

3 generated files were identified. Ignored and generated material does not inflate RepoWorth.

Measured repository distinctions

Repository evidence highlights.

Each highlight records a measured characteristic of the same repository scan used for this RepoWorth report.

architecture

Interface builder

At least 500 deterministic public interface signals were measured in source.

enablement

Documented foundation

At least 100,000 documentation tokens were measured in public documentation paths.

architecture

Integration surface

At least 1,000 deterministic integration signals were measured in source.

quality

Verification depth

At least 20 percent of measured source tokens are in test paths.

quality

Test fortress

At least 35 percent of measured source tokens are in detected test paths.

Technical effort profile

What makes this repository harder to rebuild.

Code scale, branching, dependencies, languages, structure, and visible test evidence shape the implementation and verification effort represented by this repository.

Code scaleHigh

Measured from the current source archive.

ComplexityHigh

Derived from branch density, dependencies, languages, and code scale.

VerificationHigh

Measures visible test code relative to the source corpus.

Development effort composition

Source volume alone does not explain the work.

This view separates authored evidence from the implementation, integration, verification, and engineering oversight represented by the current repository.

Reading boundary: These are modeled development inputs for the visible code. They do not include product discovery, company value, private systems, or commercial outcomes.

Weighted authored evidence959.9KProduction, tests, configuration, and documentation
Estimated implementation output959.9KImplementation, retries, integration, and verification
Engineering oversight76.8 hoursOrientation, integration, tests, and review
Active build time9.6 daysModeled effort represented by the current source state
Evidence boundary

What this valuation includes.

CodeValuation.com counted supported authored source on commit d3acd247024c48cf2cad8d33eb248d7f1cffc4ee, measured deterministic repository signals, then estimated implementation, rework, testing, integration, and engineering oversight.

Included

Supported first-party source, tests, configuration, manifests, repository structure, dependency signals, and framework boundaries.

Excluded

Common generated and vendored files, build output, dependencies, lockfiles, minified assets, binaries, media, and private systems outside this repository.

Not claimed

Ideation, intellectual-property rights, security posture, production reliability, company value, sale price, revenue, user value, proprietary data, or the cost of discovering the original product.

This is a modeled current development valuation for the repository's visible code at a specific commit. It reflects code volume, implementation output, complexity, and engineering oversight. It is not a business valuation, investment appraisal, security review, or estimate of sale price, ideation, intellectual property, revenue, users, brand, proprietary data, undocumented domain knowledge, or private infrastructure.

Check another repository

Run RepoWorth on your own codebase.

Enter a public GitHub URL to create a current repository reading.

No sign-up for public repositories. Private repositories require a free trial. Evaluated in real time directly from GitHub. Code is never stored. Derived measurements and valuation history are saved.