Current repository readingScanned Jul 24, 2026, 7:13 PM UTC

gritql Codebase Valuation

GritQL is a query language for searching, linting, and modifying code.

View biomejs/gritql on GitHub
Open share card
CodeValuation.com
RepoWorth
github.com/biomejs

gritql

GritQL is a query language for searching, linting, and modifying code.

RepoWorth$650,400Current measured development value · 364.2 active build days
Rebuild complexity100/100Profile: Complex
43.3M code tokens1K source filesRust primary language
Scanned Jul 24, 2026Public GitHub repositorycodevaluation.com/repoworth/gritql
Authored code43.3M tokens · 5,917,480 source lines
Complexity100/100 · Complex
Primary stackRust
Scan coverage96.1% · Content scan
RepoWorth development valuation

One valuation, with the evidence behind it.

RepoWorth models the current development value represented by the visible repository evidence. It does not include ideation, intellectual property, business value, product discovery, or sale price.

RepoWorthCurrent measured development value
$650,400

Modeled range $520,320 to $780,479

364.2 active build days2913.6 engineering hours36.4M implementation tokens
Repository evidenceMeasured at the scanned commit
43.3M tokens

5,917,480 source lines across 1,006 authored files

217 test files1,728 dependencies96.1% scan coverage
Measured RepoWorth history

The current RepoWorth starts the measured history.

This current scan is the first measured point. Later scans add comparable history when the repository changes. RepoWorth is not back-cast onto commits that were never scanned.

Recorded RepoWorth$650,400
Current measured reading
Measured · Jul 24, 2026Data through · Jul 24, 2026
Measurement basisCurrent readingCurrent published repository scan
Evidence coverage96%current scan
Complexity100/100Measured from code scale and structural signals
Maintainability45/100Current structure, tests, and generated-code balance

This current scan establishes the RepoWorth baseline. Comparable value changes appear only after another completed scan under the same measurement basis.

RepoWorth history compares completed repository scans only when their measurement basis is compatible. Commit activity is shown separately so delivery volume is not presented as code value.

Repository contributors

Top contributors.

Ranked from the public GitHub contributor evidence available at the latest scan. This table describes measured repository activity, not ownership or original authorship.

RankContributorContributionsShare of top groupLatest measured activity
#1morgante@morgante18051.6%Current GitHub contributor snapshot
#2arendjr@arendjr5214.9%Current GitHub contributor snapshot
#3ilevyor@ilevyor4512.9%Current GitHub contributor snapshot
#4seren5240@seren52403710.6%Current GitHub contributor snapshot
#5urbit-pilled@urbit-pilled113.2%Current GitHub contributor snapshot
#6Gankra@Gankra72.0%Current GitHub contributor snapshot
#7Alex-ley-scrub@Alex-ley-scrub61.7%Current GitHub contributor snapshot
#8Sec-ant@Sec-ant41.1%Current GitHub contributor snapshot
#9cogwirrel@cogwirrel41.1%Current GitHub contributor snapshot
#10ematipico@ematipico30.9%Current GitHub contributor snapshot
About gritql

What the public repository appears to contain.

GritQL is a query language for searching, linting, and modifying code.

astcodemodjavascriptlinterrefactoringrustsearchtree-sitter
License
MIT
Default branch
main
GitHub stars
4,555
Forks
124
Last public push
Jul 17, 2026
Repository state
Active public repository
Detected language profile189.4MB authored source
C97.03%
Rust1.37%
JavaScript0.69%
TypeScript0.29%
CSS0.2%
Python0.14%
Go0.13%
C/C++0.05%
Source files1,006
Test files217
Manifests102
Dependencies1,728
Measured technical evidence

A fuller view of what the scanner found.

These values come from the same immutable repository scan as the headline RepoWorth. They stay tied to the scanned commit so the reading can be inspected against one exact source state.

Maintainability signal45/100

Developing based on deterministic repository structure and complexity signals.

Production source43.2M tokens

First-party implementation tokens eligible for the modeled code-scale input.

Test evidence80.6K tokens

217 detected test files contribute separately from production code.

Configuration and infrastructure25.5K tokens

102 manifests and 0 workspace boundaries were detected.

Documentation133.6K tokens

200 documentation files remain visible as a distinct enablement signal.

Integration surface1,680 signals

1,728 dependency declarations and 395 public-interface signals were measured.

Repository structure11 levels deep

0 large files and 175,256 branch signals add structural context.

Excluded from authored evidence0 files

14 generated files were identified. Ignored and generated material does not inflate RepoWorth.

Measured repository distinctions

Repository evidence highlights.

Each highlight records a measured characteristic of the same repository scan used for this RepoWorth report.

enablement

Documented foundation

At least 100,000 documentation tokens were measured in public documentation paths.

architecture

Integration surface

At least 1,000 deterministic integration signals were measured in source.

scale

System-scale codebase

More than 10 million measured source tokens in one qualifying snapshot.

complexity

Branching engine

At least 100,000 deterministic control-flow and branch signals were measured in source.

operations

Infrastructure backbone

At least 100,000 measured tokens are in explicit infrastructure and deployment paths.

architecture

Dependency ecosystem

At least 500 dependency declarations were measured across supported manifests.

Technical effort profile

What makes this repository harder to rebuild.

Code scale, branching, dependencies, languages, structure, and visible test evidence shape the implementation and verification effort represented by this repository.

Code scaleHigh

Measured from the current source archive.

ComplexityHigh

Derived from branch density, dependencies, languages, and code scale.

VerificationLow

Measures visible test code relative to the source corpus.

Development effort composition

Source volume alone does not explain the work.

This view separates authored evidence from the implementation, integration, verification, and engineering oversight represented by the current repository.

Reading boundary: These are modeled development inputs for the visible code. They do not include product discovery, company value, private systems, or commercial outcomes.

Weighted authored evidence36.4MProduction, tests, configuration, and documentation
Estimated implementation output36.4MImplementation, retries, integration, and verification
Engineering oversight2913.6 hoursOrientation, integration, tests, and review
Active build time364.2 daysModeled effort represented by the current source state
Evidence boundary

What this valuation includes.

CodeValuation.com counted supported authored source on commit c80b3026471b229f41b279c3eb0c162dcdacfdb1, measured deterministic repository signals, then estimated implementation, rework, testing, integration, and engineering oversight.

Included

Supported first-party source, tests, configuration, manifests, repository structure, dependency signals, and framework boundaries.

Excluded

Common generated and vendored files, build output, dependencies, lockfiles, minified assets, binaries, media, and private systems outside this repository.

Not claimed

Ideation, intellectual-property rights, security posture, production reliability, company value, sale price, revenue, user value, proprietary data, or the cost of discovering the original product.

This is a modeled current development valuation for the repository's visible code at a specific commit. It reflects code volume, implementation output, complexity, and engineering oversight. It is not a business valuation, investment appraisal, security review, or estimate of sale price, ideation, intellectual property, revenue, users, brand, proprietary data, undocumented domain knowledge, or private infrastructure.

Check another repository

Run RepoWorth on your own codebase.

Enter a public GitHub URL to create a current repository reading.

No sign-up for public repositories. Private repositories require a free trial. Evaluated in real time directly from GitHub. Code is never stored. Derived measurements and valuation history are saved.