Current repository readingScanned Jul 24, 2026, 1:51 PM UTC

gmail-chan Codebase Valuation

OpenClaw communication channel backed by Gmail threads

View Martian-Engineering/gmail-chan on GitHub
Open share card
CodeValuation.com
RepoWorth
github.com/Martian-Engineering

gmail-chan

OpenClaw communication channel backed by Gmail threads

RepoWorth$310.58Current measured development value · Less than one active build day
Rebuild complexity62.88/100Profile: Complex
25.4K code tokens25 source filesTypeScript primary language
Scanned Jul 24, 2026Public GitHub repositorycodevaluation.com/repoworth/gmail-chan
Authored code25.4K tokens · 3,444 source lines
Complexity62.88/100 · Complex
Primary stackTypeScript
Scan coverage99.45% · Content scan
RepoWorth development valuation

One valuation, with the evidence behind it.

RepoWorth models the current development value represented by the visible repository evidence. It does not include ideation, intellectual property, business value, product discovery, or sale price.

RepoWorthCurrent measured development value
$310.58

Modeled range $248.46 to $372.70

0.2 active build days1.7 engineering hours21.3K implementation tokens
Repository evidenceMeasured at the scanned commit
25.4K tokens

3,444 source lines across 25 authored files

12 test files11 dependencies99.45% scan coverage
Measured RepoWorth history

The current RepoWorth starts the measured history.

This current scan is the first measured point. Later scans add comparable history when the repository changes. RepoWorth is not back-cast onto commits that were never scanned.

Recorded RepoWorth$310.58
Current measured reading
Measured · Jul 24, 2026Data through · Jul 24, 2026
Measurement basisCurrent readingCurrent published repository scan
Evidence coverage99%current scan
Complexity63/100Measured from code scale and structural signals
Maintainability85/100Current structure, tests, and generated-code balance

This current scan establishes the RepoWorth baseline. Comparable value changes appear only after another completed scan under the same measurement basis.

RepoWorth history compares completed repository scans only when their measurement basis is compatible. Commit activity is shown separately so delivery volume is not presented as code value.

Repository contributors

Top contributors.

Ranked from the public GitHub contributor evidence available at the latest scan. This table describes measured repository activity, not ownership or original authorship.

RankContributorContributionsShare of top groupLatest measured activity
#1Josh Lehman@jalehman1100.0%Current GitHub contributor snapshot
About gmail-chan

What the public repository appears to contain.

OpenClaw communication channel backed by Gmail threads

License
MIT
Default branch
main
GitHub stars
0
Forks
1
Last public push
Jul 12, 2026
Repository state
Active public repository
Detected language profile104.8KB authored source
TypeScript100%
Source files25
Test files12
Manifests1
Dependencies11
Measured technical evidence

A fuller view of what the scanner found.

These values come from the same immutable repository scan as the headline RepoWorth. They stay tied to the scanned commit so the reading can be inspected against one exact source state.

Maintainability signal85/100

Strong based on deterministic repository structure and complexity signals.

Production source15.1K tokens

First-party implementation tokens eligible for the modeled code-scale input.

Test evidence10.2K tokens

12 detected test files contribute separately from production code.

Configuration and infrastructure821 tokens

1 manifests and 0 workspace boundaries were detected.

Documentation5.1K tokens

3 documentation files remain visible as a distinct enablement signal.

Integration surface178 signals

11 dependency declarations and 64 public-interface signals were measured.

Repository structure1 levels deep

0 large files and 397 branch signals add structural context.

Excluded from authored evidence0 files

0 generated files were identified. Ignored and generated material does not inflate RepoWorth.

Technical effort profile

What makes this repository harder to rebuild.

Code scale, branching, dependencies, languages, structure, and visible test evidence shape the implementation and verification effort represented by this repository.

Code scaleModerate

Measured from the current source archive.

ComplexityModerate

Derived from branch density, dependencies, languages, and code scale.

VerificationHigh

Measures visible test code relative to the source corpus.

Development effort composition

Source volume alone does not explain the work.

This view separates authored evidence from the implementation, integration, verification, and engineering oversight represented by the current repository.

Reading boundary: These are modeled development inputs for the visible code. They do not include product discovery, company value, private systems, or commercial outcomes.

Weighted authored evidence21.3KProduction, tests, configuration, and documentation
Estimated implementation output21.3KImplementation, retries, integration, and verification
Engineering oversight1.7 hoursOrientation, integration, tests, and review
Active build time0.2 daysModeled effort represented by the current source state
Evidence boundary

What this valuation includes.

CodeValuation.com counted supported authored source on commit 090ae8a7966ff8e5a9116cb96f2c8ad4177dcd7f, measured deterministic repository signals, then estimated implementation, rework, testing, integration, and engineering oversight.

Included

Supported first-party source, tests, configuration, manifests, repository structure, dependency signals, and framework boundaries.

Excluded

Common generated and vendored files, build output, dependencies, lockfiles, minified assets, binaries, media, and private systems outside this repository.

Not claimed

Ideation, intellectual-property rights, security posture, production reliability, company value, sale price, revenue, user value, proprietary data, or the cost of discovering the original product.

This is a modeled current development valuation for the repository's visible code at a specific commit. It reflects code volume, implementation output, complexity, and engineering oversight. It is not a business valuation, investment appraisal, security review, or estimate of sale price, ideation, intellectual property, revenue, users, brand, proprietary data, undocumented domain knowledge, or private infrastructure.

Check another repository

Run RepoWorth on your own codebase.

Enter a public GitHub URL to create a current repository reading.

No sign-up for public repositories. Private repositories require a free trial. Evaluated in real time directly from GitHub. Code is never stored. Derived measurements and valuation history are saved.