Current repository readingScanned Jul 24, 2026, 10:02 AM UTC

evaos-code-review-bot-neondiff Codebase Valuation

Stop giving away your code. NeonDIFF is your local-first AI PR reviewer for teams that want professional quality code reviews and issue enrichment without handing every diff to a hosted review SaaS.

View electricsheephq/evaos-code-review-bot-neondiff on GitHub
Open share card
CodeValuation.com
RepoWorth
github.com/electricsheephq

evaos-code-review-bot-neondiff

Stop giving away your code. NeonDIFF is your local-first AI PR reviewer for teams that want professional quality code reviews and issue enrichment without handing every diff to a hosted review SaaS.

RepoWorth$22,967Current measured development value · 14.2 active build days
Rebuild complexity80.386/100Profile: Complex
1.8M code tokens430 source filesTypeScript primary language
Scanned Jul 24, 2026Public GitHub repositorycodevaluation.com/repoworth/evaos-code-review-bot-neondiff
Authored code1.8M tokens · 195,734 source lines
Complexity80.386/100 · Complex
Primary stackTypeScript
Scan coverage98.85% · Content scan
RepoWorth development valuation

One valuation, with the evidence behind it.

RepoWorth models the current development value represented by the visible repository evidence. It does not include ideation, intellectual property, business value, product discovery, or sale price.

RepoWorthCurrent measured development value
$22,967

Modeled range $18,374 to $27,560

14.2 active build days114.0 engineering hours1.4M implementation tokens
Repository evidenceMeasured at the scanned commit
1.8M tokens

195,734 source lines across 430 authored files

209 test files13 dependencies98.85% scan coverage
Measured RepoWorth history

The current RepoWorth starts the measured history.

This current scan is the first measured point. Later scans add comparable history when the repository changes. RepoWorth is not back-cast onto commits that were never scanned.

Recorded RepoWorth$22,967
Current measured reading
Measured · Jul 24, 2026Data through · Jul 24, 2026
Measurement basisCurrent readingCurrent published repository scan
Evidence coverage99%current scan
Complexity80/100Measured from code scale and structural signals
Maintainability76/100Current structure, tests, and generated-code balance

This current scan establishes the RepoWorth baseline. Comparable value changes appear only after another completed scan under the same measurement basis.

RepoWorth history compares completed repository scans only when their measurement basis is compatible. Commit activity is shown separately so delivery volume is not presented as code value.

Repository contributors

Top contributors.

Ranked from the public GitHub contributor evidence available at the latest scan. This table describes measured repository activity, not ownership or original authorship.

RankContributorContributionsShare of top groupLatest measured activity
#1EVA@100yenadmin643100.0%Current GitHub contributor snapshot
About evaos-code-review-bot-neondiff

What the public repository appears to contain.

Stop giving away your code. NeonDIFF is your local-first AI PR reviewer for teams that want professional quality code reviews and issue enrichment without handing every diff to a hosted review SaaS.

License
NOASSERTION
Default branch
main
GitHub stars
4
Forks
0
Last public push
Jul 22, 2026
Repository state
Active public repository
Detected language profile7.6MB authored source
TypeScript81.9%
Swift17.01%
Shell1.03%
Python0.06%
Source files430
Test files209
Manifests2
Dependencies13
Measured technical evidence

A fuller view of what the scanner found.

These values come from the same immutable repository scan as the headline RepoWorth. They stay tied to the scanned commit so the reading can be inspected against one exact source state.

Maintainability signal76/100

Strong based on deterministic repository structure and complexity signals.

Production source824.3K tokens

First-party implementation tokens eligible for the modeled code-scale input.

Test evidence945.6K tokens

209 detected test files contribute separately from production code.

Configuration and infrastructure1.1K tokens

2 manifests and 0 workspace boundaries were detected.

Documentation299.1K tokens

180 documentation files remain visible as a distinct enablement signal.

Integration surface3,543 signals

13 dependency declarations and 1,440 public-interface signals were measured.

Repository structure6 levels deep

0 large files and 28,232 branch signals add structural context.

Excluded from authored evidence0 files

4 generated files were identified. Ignored and generated material does not inflate RepoWorth.

Measured repository distinctions

Repository evidence highlights.

Each highlight records a measured characteristic of the same repository scan used for this RepoWorth report.

architecture

Interface builder

At least 500 deterministic public interface signals were measured in source.

enablement

Documented foundation

At least 100,000 documentation tokens were measured in public documentation paths.

architecture

Integration surface

At least 1,000 deterministic integration signals were measured in source.

quality

Verification depth

At least 20 percent of measured source tokens are in test paths.

quality

Test fortress

At least 35 percent of measured source tokens are in detected test paths.

Technical effort profile

What makes this repository harder to rebuild.

Code scale, branching, dependencies, languages, structure, and visible test evidence shape the implementation and verification effort represented by this repository.

Code scaleHigh

Measured from the current source archive.

ComplexityHigh

Derived from branch density, dependencies, languages, and code scale.

VerificationHigh

Measures visible test code relative to the source corpus.

Development effort composition

Source volume alone does not explain the work.

This view separates authored evidence from the implementation, integration, verification, and engineering oversight represented by the current repository.

Reading boundary: These are modeled development inputs for the visible code. They do not include product discovery, company value, private systems, or commercial outcomes.

Weighted authored evidence1.4MProduction, tests, configuration, and documentation
Estimated implementation output1.4MImplementation, retries, integration, and verification
Engineering oversight114.0 hoursOrientation, integration, tests, and review
Active build time14.2 daysModeled effort represented by the current source state
Evidence boundary

What this valuation includes.

CodeValuation.com counted supported authored source on commit c1bbdbb986e4b91b604a328bfa44f64026f86c93, measured deterministic repository signals, then estimated implementation, rework, testing, integration, and engineering oversight.

Included

Supported first-party source, tests, configuration, manifests, repository structure, dependency signals, and framework boundaries.

Excluded

Common generated and vendored files, build output, dependencies, lockfiles, minified assets, binaries, media, and private systems outside this repository.

Not claimed

Ideation, intellectual-property rights, security posture, production reliability, company value, sale price, revenue, user value, proprietary data, or the cost of discovering the original product.

This is a modeled current development valuation for the repository's visible code at a specific commit. It reflects code volume, implementation output, complexity, and engineering oversight. It is not a business valuation, investment appraisal, security review, or estimate of sale price, ideation, intellectual property, revenue, users, brand, proprietary data, undocumented domain knowledge, or private infrastructure.

Check another repository

Run RepoWorth on your own codebase.

Enter a public GitHub URL to create a current repository reading.

No sign-up for public repositories. Private repositories require a free trial. Evaluated in real time directly from GitHub. Code is never stored. Derived measurements and valuation history are saved.