Current repository readingScanned Jul 24, 2026, 4:41 AM UTC

eslint-to-oxlint Codebase Valuation

Vite coded tools to migrate from ESLint (8) to oxlint

View skovhus/eslint-to-oxlint on GitHub
Open share card
CodeValuation.com
RepoWorth
github.com/skovhus

eslint-to-oxlint

Vite coded tools to migrate from ESLint (8) to oxlint

RepoWorth$490.39Current measured development value · Less than one active build day
Rebuild complexity66.651/100Profile: Complex
39.8K code tokens14 source filesTypeScript primary language
Scanned Jul 24, 2026Public GitHub repositorycodevaluation.com/repoworth/eslint-to-oxlint
Authored code39.8K tokens · 5,008 source lines
Complexity66.651/100 · Complex
Primary stackTypeScript
Scan coverage100% · Content scan
RepoWorth development valuation

One valuation, with the evidence behind it.

RepoWorth models the current development value represented by the visible repository evidence. It does not include ideation, intellectual property, business value, product discovery, or sale price.

RepoWorthCurrent measured development value
$490.39

Modeled range $392.31 to $588.47

0.3 active build days2.6 engineering hours32.9K implementation tokens
Repository evidenceMeasured at the scanned commit
39.8K tokens

5,008 source lines across 14 authored files

11 test files29 dependencies100% scan coverage
Measured RepoWorth history

The current RepoWorth starts the measured history.

This current scan is the first measured point. Later scans add comparable history when the repository changes. RepoWorth is not back-cast onto commits that were never scanned.

Recorded RepoWorth$490.39
Current measured reading
Measured · Jul 24, 2026Data through · Jul 24, 2026
Measurement basisCurrent readingCurrent published repository scan
Evidence coverage100%current scan
Complexity67/100Measured from code scale and structural signals
Maintainability83/100Current structure, tests, and generated-code balance

This current scan establishes the RepoWorth baseline. Comparable value changes appear only after another completed scan under the same measurement basis.

RepoWorth history compares completed repository scans only when their measurement basis is compatible. Commit activity is shown separately so delivery volume is not presented as code value.

Repository contributors

Top contributors.

Ranked from the public GitHub contributor evidence available at the latest scan. This table describes measured repository activity, not ownership or original authorship.

RankContributorContributionsShare of top groupLatest measured activity
#1Kenneth Skovhus@skovhus13100.0%Current GitHub contributor snapshot
About eslint-to-oxlint

What the public repository appears to contain.

Vite coded tools to migrate from ESLint (8) to oxlint

License
MIT
Default branch
main
GitHub stars
0
Forks
0
Last public push
Dec 15, 2025
Repository state
Active public repository
Detected language profile167.4KB authored source
TypeScript77.99%
JavaScript22.01%
Source files14
Test files11
Manifests5
Dependencies29
Measured technical evidence

A fuller view of what the scanner found.

These values come from the same immutable repository scan as the headline RepoWorth. They stay tied to the scanned commit so the reading can be inspected against one exact source state.

Maintainability signal83/100

Strong based on deterministic repository structure and complexity signals.

Production source17.3K tokens

First-party implementation tokens eligible for the modeled code-scale input.

Test evidence22.6K tokens

11 detected test files contribute separately from production code.

Configuration and infrastructure597 tokens

5 manifests and 0 workspace boundaries were detected.

Documentation229 tokens

1 documentation files remain visible as a distinct enablement signal.

Integration surface58 signals

29 dependency declarations and 27 public-interface signals were measured.

Repository structure4 levels deep

0 large files and 555 branch signals add structural context.

Excluded from authored evidence0 files

1 generated files were identified. Ignored and generated material does not inflate RepoWorth.

Technical effort profile

What makes this repository harder to rebuild.

Code scale, branching, dependencies, languages, structure, and visible test evidence shape the implementation and verification effort represented by this repository.

Code scaleModerate

Measured from the current source archive.

ComplexityModerate

Derived from branch density, dependencies, languages, and code scale.

VerificationHigh

Measures visible test code relative to the source corpus.

Development effort composition

Source volume alone does not explain the work.

This view separates authored evidence from the implementation, integration, verification, and engineering oversight represented by the current repository.

Reading boundary: These are modeled development inputs for the visible code. They do not include product discovery, company value, private systems, or commercial outcomes.

Weighted authored evidence32.9KProduction, tests, configuration, and documentation
Estimated implementation output32.9KImplementation, retries, integration, and verification
Engineering oversight2.6 hoursOrientation, integration, tests, and review
Active build time0.3 daysModeled effort represented by the current source state
Evidence boundary

What this valuation includes.

CodeValuation.com counted supported authored source on commit 97e1d4bcb79b574a9e68699ffff4307960c19953, measured deterministic repository signals, then estimated implementation, rework, testing, integration, and engineering oversight.

Included

Supported first-party source, tests, configuration, manifests, repository structure, dependency signals, and framework boundaries.

Excluded

Common generated and vendored files, build output, dependencies, lockfiles, minified assets, binaries, media, and private systems outside this repository.

Not claimed

Ideation, intellectual-property rights, security posture, production reliability, company value, sale price, revenue, user value, proprietary data, or the cost of discovering the original product.

This is a modeled current development valuation for the repository's visible code at a specific commit. It reflects code volume, implementation output, complexity, and engineering oversight. It is not a business valuation, investment appraisal, security review, or estimate of sale price, ideation, intellectual property, revenue, users, brand, proprietary data, undocumented domain knowledge, or private infrastructure.

Check another repository

Run RepoWorth on your own codebase.

Enter a public GitHub URL to create a current repository reading.

No sign-up for public repositories. Private repositories require a free trial. Evaluated in real time directly from GitHub. Code is never stored. Derived measurements and valuation history are saved.